# Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

> Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-2-0-flash-lite-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 25.1.
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 37.8 | 29.3 |
| Rank | 194 | 313 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1034 |
| LiveBench Coding | 47.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 23.3% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1324 | 1005 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 50.1% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.1 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1309 | 1047 |
| Omni-MATH | 37.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 58.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1305 | 970 |
| MMLU-Pro | 72% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1100 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1323 | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1339 | 1012 |
| LMArena German | 1306 | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | 1325 | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | 1328 | 990 |
| LMArena French | 1347 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1313 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1305 | 992 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 78.3% | — |
| IFEval | 82.4% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1320 | 1003 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1330 | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1307 | 959 |
| WildBench | 79% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.