# Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-pro-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 9 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Qwen3 32B leads 32.3 to 17.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 66.9% for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 253 | 166 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137)
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1335 |
| DTBench | 59% | 67.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 138.51 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1399 |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 65.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1362 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72)
- Qwen3 32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1310 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180)
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1305 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167)
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1331 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Qwen3 32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.