# Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-pro-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 24.8 to 12.3.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 253 | 179 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1314 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1299 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| DTBench | 59% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1310 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1275 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1299 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.