# Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Llama 4 Scout

> Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-pro-vs-llama-4-scout
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 31

## Summary

- They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 2 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 52.5 to 37.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 7.8% for Llama 4 Scout.
- Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 27.4 |
| Rank | 253 | 323 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239)
- Llama 4 Scout: 19.9 (#334)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1286 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | 43.1% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9.1% |
| SciCode | — | 17% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137)
- Llama 4 Scout: 24.4 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.1% |
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332)
- Llama 4 Scout: 9.2 (#339)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1266 |
| DTBench | 59% | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 129.64 |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | 57.5 |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 0.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMCA | — | 12% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260)
- Llama 4 Scout: 18.4 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 7.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | 37.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1286 |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | 62.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228)
- Llama 4 Scout: 31.8 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 51.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | 74.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | 50.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1236 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.7% |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72)
- Llama 4 Scout: 31.6 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | 1118 |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 34.2% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169)
- Llama 4 Scout: 41.3 (#207)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1253 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1256 |
| LMArena French | 1301 | 1283 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1274 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1209 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1263 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1310 | 1277 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180)
- Llama 4 Scout: 66.0 (#212)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 83.7% | 81.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1248 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164)
- Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#289)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1265 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 36% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167)
- Llama 4 Scout: 37.1 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 4 Scout |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1279 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1249 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | 78% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1281 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 783 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Llama 4 Scout?

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 19.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Llama 4 Scout share?

31 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.