# Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Llama 2-13B

> Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-pro-vs-llama-2-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 2-13B in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) leads 52.5 to 30.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 59% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 42.2% for Llama 2-13B.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 253 | 304 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.4 (#287)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1062 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137)
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332)
- Llama 2-13B: 12.3 (#333)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1051 |
| DTBench | 59% | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 105.8 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260)
- Llama 2-13B: 28.7 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1065 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228)
- Llama 2-13B: 27.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1030 |
| MMLU | 86.9% | 55.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72)
- Llama 2-13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169)
- Llama 2-13B: 26.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1001 |
| LMArena French | 1301 | 1043 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1310 | 1086 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180)
- Llama 2-13B: 53.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1046 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164)
- Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1064 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167)
- Llama 2-13B: 30.0 (#284)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1085 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1050 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Llama 2-13B?

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 30.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Llama 2-13B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.