# Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Grok 4.6

> Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-pro-vs-grok-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 25

## Summary

- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 12.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 23.1% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 99.2% for Grok 4.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 56.9 |
| Rank | 261 | 21 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 34.2 (#241)
- Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 22.2% | 67.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1465 |
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1617 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| SciCode | — | 56.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.9 (#145)
- Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#338)
- Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | 67.1% |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | 75.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1447 |
| DTBench | 59% | 97.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 156.44 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 25.8 (#266)
- Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 99.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1423 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.4 (#239)
- Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 94% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1467 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.8 (#77)
- Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | 1263 |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.3 (#174)
- Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1302 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | 1376 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1422 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1311 | 1404 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.6 (#185)
- Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1431 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.8 (#169)
- Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.4 (#172)
- Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1428 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1425 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Grok 4.6 share?

25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.