# Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) vs Gemma 3 12B

> Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Gemma 3 12B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-pro-vs-gemma-3-12b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 3 12B in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Gemma 3 12B leads 25.3 to 17.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 57.2% for Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and 39.5% for Gemma 3 12B.
- Gemma 3 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 253 | 255 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 33.8 (#239)
- Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1294 | 1281 |
| SciCode | — | 17.4% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.5% | — |
| CadEval | 34% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 17.8 (#137)
- Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 30.4% |
| TheAgentCompany | 3.4% | — |
| Cybench | 7.5% | — |
| BALROG | 21% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 12.3 (#332)
- Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1296 | 1309 |
| DTBench | 59% | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 131.73 | 123.49 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 27.1% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMCA | — | 4.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 89.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | 58.4 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 24.4 (#260)
- Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 23.1% | 16.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1307 |
| Omni-MATH | 36.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 29.3 (#228)
- Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 57.2% | 39.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1279 | 1248 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 13.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 53.4% | — |
| MMLU | 86.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 36.2 (#72)
- Gemma 3 12B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1161 | — |
| Video-MME | 75% | — |
| MindCube | — | 46.7% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 45.5 (#169)
- Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1312 | 1318 |
| LMArena German | 1286 | 1370 |
| LMArena Russian | 1320 | 1335 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1331 | — |
| LMArena French | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1292 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1310 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 68.8 (#180)
- Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1297 | 1299 |
| IFEval | 83.7% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 39.7 (#164)
- Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1308 | 1317 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024): 52.5 (#167)
- Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1319 | 1334 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1333 | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1296 | 1334 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1126 |
| WildBench | 81.3% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) better than Gemma 3 12B?

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Gemma 3 12B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.9 vs 31.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) or Gemma 3 12B better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) and Gemma 3 12B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Pro (May 2024) has 45 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.