# Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Qwen3.8 Max

> Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-vs-qwen3-8-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 22.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.3% for Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and 100% for Qwen3.8 Max.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 56.8 |
| Rank | 246 | 22 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 34.4 (#236)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1261 | 1502 |
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1674 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 17.8% |
| SciCode | — | 53.2% |
| WeirdML | 24.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 67.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.6 (#102)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| BALROG | 14.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 21.7 (#215)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1496 |
| DTBench | 53.8% | 92% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.36 | 156.41 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| ForecastBench | 53.9 | — |
| PIQA | 87.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 22.1 (#281)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.3% | 100% |
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1499 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| Omni-MATH | 30.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 61.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#260)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | 92.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1233 | 1507 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.8% | — |
| MMLU | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 36.0 (#81)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1141 | 1314 |
| Video-MME | 70.3% | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 42.9 (#189)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1278 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1295 | 1538 |
| LMArena French | 1258 | 1503 |
| LMArena German | 1262 | 1483 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1252 | 1467 |
| LMArena Korean | 1221 | 1461 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1243 | 1492 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 66.8 (#205)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1258 | 1479 |
| IFEval | 83.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#187)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1284 | 1489 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.7 (#196)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | 1479 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | 1489 |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Qwen3.8 Max share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.