# Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Qwen2.5-Max

> Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-vs-qwen2-5-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5-Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 34.3 to 20.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.9 | 40.1 |
| Rank | 240 | 142 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 33.9 (#233)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1262 | 1359 |
| WeirdML | 24.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 67.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.3 (#97)
- Qwen2.5-Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 14.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 20.8 (#212)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1360 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.37 | 132.54 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| DTBench | 53.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| ForecastBench | 53.9 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
| PIQA | 87.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 20.8 (#274)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1369 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 30.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 61.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#253)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1233 | 1337 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.8% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.8% | — |
| MMLU | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 35.3 (#76)
- Qwen2.5-Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1141 | — |
| Video-MME | 70.3% | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 43.1 (#184)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1278 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1295 | 1382 |
| LMArena French | 1257 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1262 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1252 | 1299 |
| LMArena Korean | 1220 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1377 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 67.0 (#199)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1258 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
| IFEval | 83.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#182)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1284 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.9 (#190)
- Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than Qwen2.5-Max?

Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?

Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Qwen2.5-Max share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.