# Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) leads 34.4 to 22.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 43.5% for Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and 49% for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 33.4 |
| Rank | 246 | 245 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 34.4 (#236)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.5% | 49% |
| LMArena Coding | 1261 | 1276 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.1% | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | 75.6% | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | 67.5% | 77% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| WeirdML | 24.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.6 (#102)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 14.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 21.7 (#215)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1251 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.36 | 119.49 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| DTBench | 53.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| ForecastBench | 53.9 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| PIQA | 87.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 22.1 (#281)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1251 |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | 93% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 30.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 61.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#260)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1233 | 1221 |
| MMLU | 77.9% | 79.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.7% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| BoolQ | 85.8% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 36.0 (#81)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1141 | — |
| Video-MME | 70.3% | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 42.9 (#189)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1278 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1295 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | 1258 | — |
| LMArena German | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1252 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1221 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1243 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 66.8 (#205)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1258 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
| IFEval | 83.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#187)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1284 | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.7 (#196)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | 1222 |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.2 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.