# Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 33.6 to 20.8.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.9 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 240 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 33.9 (#233)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1262 | 1292 |
| WeirdML | 24.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 43.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75.6% | — |
| MBPP+ | 67.5% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.3 (#97)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 14.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 20.8 (#212)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1272 |
| DTBench | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.37 | — |
| ForecastBench | 53.9 | — |
| PIQA | 87.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 20.8 (#274)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 30.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 61.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0% | — |
| GSM8K | 82.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 26.2 (#253)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1233 | 1294 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 43.7% | — |
| BoolQ | 85.8% | — |
| MMLU | 77.9% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 35.3 (#76)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1141 | — |
| Video-MME | 70.3% | — |
| GeoBench | 76% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 43.1 (#184)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1278 | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1295 | 1241 |
| LMArena French | 1257 | 1262 |
| LMArena German | 1262 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1242 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1252 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1220 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 67.0 (#199)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1258 | 1246 |
| IFEval | 83.1% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 39.0 (#182)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1284 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024): 48.9 (#190)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1287 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | 1252 |
| WildBench | 79.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash (May 2024) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.