# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 40.3 to 16.0.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 292 | 180 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1359 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1233 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Trinity Large Thinking share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.