# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 32B leads 39.7 to 14.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.6% for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and 66.9% for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 39.2 |
| Rank | 301 | 172 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244)
- Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | 1334 |
| DTBench | 50% | 67.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302)
- Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1399 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 65.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1362 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115)
- Qwen3 32B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236)
- Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232)
- Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Qwen3 32B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.