# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 36.3 to 14.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 301 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1291 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | 1272 |
| DTBench | 50% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1295 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1234 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.