# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 33.6 to 13.3.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 292 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1346 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | 1322 |
| DTBench | 50% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1307 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1233 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.