# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Llama 3.2 3B

> Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-llama-3-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.2 3B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 3.2 3B leads 32.4 to 14.2.
- Llama 3.2 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 28.9 |
| Rank | 301 | 321 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.33 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.6 (#319)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 23.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 28.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 21.0 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | 1095 |
| DTBench | 50% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 32.4 (#214)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1126 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.7 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1090 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115)
- Llama 3.2 3B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.2 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1017 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 949 |
| LMArena French | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.0 (#275)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1089 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1100 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.7 (#307)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1094 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1105 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 28.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Llama 3.2 3B better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 3.2 3B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.