# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Llama 2-7B

> Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-llama-2-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-7B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama 2-7B leads 28.2 to 13.3.
- Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 292 | 315 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.7 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1002 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242)
- Llama 2-7B: 15.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | 1009 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 98.54 |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1042 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285)
- Llama 2-7B: 27.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1036 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110)
- Llama 2-7B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224)
- Llama 2-7B: 23.9 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 973 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 973 |
| LMArena French | 1233 | 969 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 995 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1007 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231)
- Llama 2-7B: 51.0 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1006 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220)
- Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 999 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227)
- Llama 2-7B: 28.1 (#293)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1029 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Llama 2-7B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 28.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 2-7B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.