# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Llama 2-70B

> Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-llama-2-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads 38.5 to 27.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 50% for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and 41.6% for Llama 2-70B.
- Llama 2-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 301 | 349 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225)
- Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1079 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244)
- Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | 1073 |
| DTBench | 50% | 41.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 64.9% |
| CommonsenseQA 2.0 | — | 50% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.79 |
| ForecastBench | — | 51.4 |
| HellaSwag | — | 85.3% |
| LAMBADA | — | 78.9% |
| PIQA | — | 82.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.2% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302)
- Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | 0% |
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1091 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 3.3% |
| GSM8K | — | 69.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289)
- Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 26.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1039 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 88.6% |
| MMLU | — | 69.9% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 60.2% |
| TriviaQA | — | 87.6% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115)
- Llama 2-70B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229)
- Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1045 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 995 |
| LMArena French | 1234 | 1090 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1041 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | 927 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 964 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1083 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1143 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236)
- Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1071 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1062 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232)
- Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 2-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1115 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1075 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1088 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Llama 2-70B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 2-70B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.