# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Llama 13b

> Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 8

## Summary

- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads 43.0 to 13.9.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 23.9 |
| Rank | 292 | 344 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221)
- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 683 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242)
- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | 728 |
| DTBench | 50% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.09 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296)
- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 838 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224)
- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | — |
| LMArena French | 1233 | — |
| LMArena German | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231)
- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 781 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227)
- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Llama 13b?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Llama 13b better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Llama 13b share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.