# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs GLM-4.7-Flash

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-glm-4-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 34.4 to 13.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 4.6% for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 38.4 |
| Rank | 292 | 175 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1383 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | 1356 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 50% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | 58.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1354 |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 60.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1357 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1403 |
| LMArena French | 1233 | 1332 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1336 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 1284 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1333 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1327 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1345 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1125 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?

GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 34.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.