# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs GLM-4.6V

> GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-glm-4-6v
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.6V leads 38.0 to 16.0.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 301 | 137 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.90 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 35.5 (#225)
- GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1390 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 20.0 (#244)
- GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1209 | 1368 |
| DTBench | 50% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 14.2 (#302)
- GLM-4.6V: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1207 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#289)
- GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1371 |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 28.2 (#115)
- GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | 1164 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.5 (#229)
- GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1359 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1340 |
| LMArena French | 1234 | — |
| LMArena German | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 62.8 (#236)
- GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1352 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 37.0 (#225)
- GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1358 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 42.8 (#232)
- GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | GLM-4.6V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1347 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1360 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and GLM-4.6V share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.