# Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B vs Gemma 2 27B

> Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 2 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-5-flash-8b-vs-gemma-2-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 2 27B in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B leads 19.2 to 14.8.
- Gemma 2 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 29.2 |
| Rank | 292 | 302 |
| Context | — | 8K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.65 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 34.9 (#221)
- Gemma 2 27B: 33.5 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1211 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 42.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 19.2 (#242)
- Gemma 2 27B: 14.8 (#313)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1210 | 1199 |
| DTBench | 50% | 48% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 28.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 47.9% |
| LMCA | — | 7.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 38.2% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 13.3 (#296)
- Gemma 2 27B: 10.0 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 4.6% | 1.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1207 | 1212 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 26.5% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 27.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 16.0 (#285)
- Gemma 2 27B: 18.9 (#275)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1185 | 1172 |
| Confabulations | — | 27.1% |
| MMLU | — | 75.7% |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 27.6 (#110)
- Gemma 2 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1044 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 38.6 (#224)
- Gemma 2 27B: 38.8 (#221)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1215 | 1217 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1231 | 1221 |
| LMArena French | 1233 | 1246 |
| LMArena German | 1206 | 1209 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1150 | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | 1140 | 1174 |
| LMArena Russian | 1236 | 1234 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1212 | 1228 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 63.1 (#231)
- Gemma 2 27B: 60.7 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1199 | 1206 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.1% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 36.9 (#220)
- Gemma 2 27B: 37.3 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1231 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B: 43.0 (#227)
- Gemma 2 27B: 44.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B | Gemma 2 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1226 | 1231 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1218 | 1241 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1185 | 1224 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 32.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B better than Gemma 2 27B?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 2 27B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 29.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B or Gemma 2 27B better for coding?

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B and Gemma 2 27B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 27B has 34.
