# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Step 3

> Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-step-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3 leads 37.6 to 9.3.
- Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 40.5 |
| Rank | 332 | 149 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1367 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1333 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1371 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1371 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1332 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1326 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1341 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Step 3 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.