# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs QwQ-32B

> QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and QwQ-32B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where QwQ-32B leads 36.2 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 59.2% for QwQ-32B.
- QwQ-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 327 | 153 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- QwQ-32B: 34.9 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1333 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 20.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 44.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 72.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- QwQ-32B: 22.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1326 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 137.6 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 83.5% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65% |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 72% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- QwQ-32B: 36.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 59.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- QwQ-32B: 37.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1323 |
| Confabulations | — | 15.6% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- QwQ-32B: 45.0 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1306 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1378 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1337 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1313 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1297 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1353 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1278 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- QwQ-32B: 72.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1297 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.8% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- QwQ-32B: 49.0 (#11)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1308 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- QwQ-32B: 50.9 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | QwQ-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1329 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 80.2% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1257 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 51.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or QwQ-32B better for coding?

QwQ-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.9 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and QwQ-32B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and QwQ-32B has 36.