# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 15.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 97.1% for Qwen3 Max.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 43.7 |
| Rank | 332 | 87 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 82.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 142.38 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1446 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 97.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 72.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1455 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1449 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1462 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1399 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1419 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3 Max share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.