# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.8 Max

> Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen3-8-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 100% for Qwen3.8 Max.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 56.8 |
| Rank | 332 | 22 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1502 |
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1674 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 17.8% |
| SciCode | — | 53.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1496 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 92% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 156.41 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 100% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1499 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 92.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1507 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1538 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1503 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1483 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1467 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1492 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1461 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1479 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1489 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1479 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1489 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.8 Max share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.