# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 50.6 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 93.3% for Qwen3.6 Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 47.3 |
| Rank | 327 | 54 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $3 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1449 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 81.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 147.67 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 88.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1456 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1454 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1451 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1389 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1432 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1381 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1440 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1405 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.