# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

> Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen3-6-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 54.1 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 91.1% for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 332 | 43 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1471 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1482 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 4,254 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1457 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 87.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 149.24 |
| SimpleBench | — | 63% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| LMCA | — | 42.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1465 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 23.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 87.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1478 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 52% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1437 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1487 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1445 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1454 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1438 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1457 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.6 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1447 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.