# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 86.7% for Qwen3.5 Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 327 | 103 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 45.9% | 80.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 146.79 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.