# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 37.4 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 84.4% for Qwen3.5-Flash.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 332 | 112 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1412 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1244 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1403 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 82.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 143.98 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1407 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1390 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1368 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1400 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1344 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Qwen3.5-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.