# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3.5-9B

> Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen3-5-9b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-9B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 46.0 to 15.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 61.7% for Qwen3.5-9B.
- Qwen3.5-9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 332 | 236 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 27.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| DTBench | 45.9% | 71.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 139.46 |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| LMCA | — | 24.5% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 61.7% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 79% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Qwen3.5-9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3.5-9B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.