# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3-4B

> Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3-4B leads 28.5 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.
- Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 327 | 261 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | — |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 52.2% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | — |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3-4B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.