# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 32B leads 37.9 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 66.9% for Qwen3 32B.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 327 | 166 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1335 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 67.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 138.51 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1399 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 65.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1362 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1311 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen3 32B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.