# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 33.5 to 8.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 327 | 179 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1314 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1299 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.