# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 30.8 to 8.7.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 32.9 |
| Rank | 327 | 239 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1276 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 77% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1251 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 119.41 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1221 |
| MMLU | 70% | 79.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.