# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 36.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 65.3% for Qwen Plus.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 332 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1328 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 81.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1328 |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.