# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen Max

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Max in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Max leads 30.3 to 15.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 67.2% for Qwen Max.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 327 | 226 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1270 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1248 |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1329 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1205 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1290 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1141 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Qwen Max better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen Max share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.