# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 33.8 to 8.7.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 327 | 182 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1318 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1302 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1315 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1272 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1289 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.