# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 33.6 to 8.7.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 327 | 168 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1346 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1322 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1307 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1283 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1298 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1312 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1309 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.