# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 9.3.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 332 | 254 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1210 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1208 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1208 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.