# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs o1

> o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-o1
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where o1 leads 36.1 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 94.7% for o1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 40.9 |
| Rank | 332 | 143 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $15 |
| Output $/M | — | $60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- o1: 46.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1367 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 80.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- o1: 24.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- o1: 27.9 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1371 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 74.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 141.91 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- o1: 36.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 73.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1388 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- o1: 41.5 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 76.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1361 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- o1: 34.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- o1: 48.6 (#142)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1394 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1344 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1345 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- o1: 74.8 (#86)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- o1: 50.3 (#9)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- o1: 55.6 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than o1?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and o1 share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.