# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs o1-mini

> o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-o1-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where o1-mini leads 35.4 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 89.2% for o1-mini.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 34.0 |
| Rank | 332 | 235 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1362 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 89% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 78.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1333 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 135.82 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 46.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1358 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 89.2% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 62.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1316 |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1314 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1293 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1245 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1303 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1304 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1320 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1244 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1314 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than o1-mini?

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or o1-mini better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and o1-mini share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.