# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Mixtral 8x22B

> Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mixtral 8x22B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.1 vs 26.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-mixtral-8x22b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 5 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mixtral 8x22B leads 21.2 to 8.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 11.2% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 24.2% for Mixtral 8x22B.
- Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 26.7 |
| Rank | 327 | 330 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 23.8 (#324)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1166 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | 72% |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | 64.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 3.2% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 40.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 50.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Mixtral 8x22B: 22.8 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 7.5% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 19.1 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1150 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 122 |
| ForecastBench | — | 56.3 |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 21.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1184 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | 24.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#288)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1113 |
| MMLU | 70% | 77.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 46% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 33.4% |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 32.9 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1128 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1116 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1165 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1141 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1037 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1158 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1150 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1056 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 57.9 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1147 |
| IFEval | — | 72.4% |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 34.6 (#242)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1144 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Mixtral 8x22B: 37.1 (#257)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mixtral 8x22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1162 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1141 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1130 |
| WildBench | — | 71.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mixtral 8x22B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.1 vs 26.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.6 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mixtral 8x22B share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.