# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.5

> Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-mistral-medium-3-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 36.4 to 8.7.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 327 | 151 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1461 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1263 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1436 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | 141.42 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 41.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 12.9% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1432 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1431 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1222 |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1443 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1453 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1406 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1387 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1414 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1414 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Mistral Medium 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1421 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1372 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 993 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.