# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiniMax-M2

> MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-minimax-m2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiniMax-M2 leads 34.6 to 8.7.
- MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 327 | 201 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1350 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1336 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1314 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1367 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1336 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1326 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1329 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1332 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1362 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiniMax-M2 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.