# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiniMax-M2.1

> MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.1 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 38.3 to 9.3.
- MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 332 | 178 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1421 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1411 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1397 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1431 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1404 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1381 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1298 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1396 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.