# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Pro

> MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-mimo-v2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 36.7 to 8.7.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 42.4 |
| Rank | 327 | 102 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1447 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1479 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | 1470 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | 1458 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1444 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259)
- MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1456 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Pro?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Pro share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.