# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 9.3.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 332 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1420 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.