# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Magistral Medium

> Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-magistral-medium
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 1 category and Magistral Medium in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Magistral Medium leads 35.1 to 9.3.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 35.2 |
| Rank | 332 | 227 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $5 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1250 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1223 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1227 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1267 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1175 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1271 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1125 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1254 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1295 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1275 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Magistral Medium scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Magistral Medium share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.