# Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Longcat Flash Chat

> Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemini-1-0-pro-vs-longcat-flash-chat
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 39.4 to 9.3.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 332 | 120 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1471 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 17.7% |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | — |

## Math

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1408 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1373 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1445 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1371 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1411 |

## Long Context

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1425 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264)
- Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1418 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Longcat Flash Chat share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.